Analytic Cycling Logo Power Measurement:
Gears



How do you use your gears? What gear were you in for the sprint? Is your cadence uniform over a range of gears?

In the plots below, the vertical bands are the data points at the same gear development. Gear development, the distance a bike moves forward with one revolution of the pedals, is calculated from Cadence and Speed. We see bands of data because the Cadence values are not precise. These bands may not always show up in your data. This depends on how a rider pedals and how the power measuring device measures cadence. The time increment between data points must also be around a second or less, otherwise the data values for cadence are an average, not an instantaneous value.

This could be useful for determining the gear used for a particular power measurement made while riding a fixed-gear bike.

Would we expect to see the highest torques in the lowest gears?


Gear Development verses Torque.


The range of power is about the same in all gears:


Gear Development verses Power in watts.


The range of cadence is about the same in all gears:


Gear Development verses Cadence.


The Hear Rate range is about the same in all gears:


Gear Development verses Hear Rate.


As speed increases, riders use bigger gears. This would be expected; it's the reason why we have gears.


Gear Development verses Speed.

This is data from a short, flat Time Trial. It was ridden in one gear. It shows a wide range of power.


Gear Development verses Power for a short Time Trial.

This is from the same short, flat Time Trial as above. It shows a wide range of cadence.


Gear Development verses Cadence for a short Time Trial.

Gear Development
  39 42 52 53
11 7.474 8.049 9.965 10.157
12 6.851 7.378 9.135 9.310
13 6.324 6.810 8.432 8.594
14 5.872 6.324 7.830 7.980
15 5.481 5.902 7.308 7.448
16 5.138 5.534 6.851 6.983
17 4.836 5.208 6.448 6.572
18 4.567 4.919 6.090 6.207
19 4.327 4.660 5.769 5.880
20 4.111 4.427 5.481 5.586
21 3.915 4.216 5.220 5.320
22 3.737 4.024 4.983 5.078
23 3.574 3.849 4.766 4.858
24 3.426 3.689 4.567 4.655
25 3.288 3.541 4.385 4.469
26 3.162 3.405 4.216 4.297
27 3.045 3.279 4.060 4.138
28 2.936 3.162 3.915 3.990

© 2002 Tom Compton